{
  "id": 1750249,
  "name": "Everett L. REDING v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reding v. State",
  "decision_date": "1982-11-01",
  "docket_number": "CR 82-97",
  "first_page": "288",
  "last_page": "289",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "277 Ark. 288"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "641 S.W.2d 24"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "277 Ark. 146",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1750262
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/277/0146-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1395,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.852,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.304828124825895e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2712451575362116
    },
    "sha256": "698ff78df0c0b3c992bf04d625383c15a27ec908f437c3c1a218eac88318fc77",
    "simhash": "1:408228bc4a6a7241",
    "word_count": 234
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:10.927944+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Everett L. REDING v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman, Justice.\nEverett L. Reding was convicted of delivery of marijuana and sentenced to four years\u2019 imprisonment and a $1,000 fine. Reding\u2019s two arguments on appeal are meritless and the judgment is affirmed.\nThe first issue was disposed of recently in the case of Merrill v. State, 277 Ark. 146, 640 S.W.2d 787 (1982) where we held Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 82-2116 (Supp. 1981) did not repeal Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 82-2617 (Supp. 1981).\nThe second issue is a challenge of the forfeiture of a 1973 Ford Pinto station wagon, which Reding drove to the residence where he sold the marijuana to an undercover agent. In a separate hearing after the trial and conviction, the trial court found the vehicle could be forfeited under Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 82-2629 (Supp. 1981). He found by a preponderance of the evidence that the vehicle should be forfeited. Among the evidence was testimony by the undercover agent that the substance he bought was marijuana, that it was transported in the Pinto, and the judgment of Reding\u2019s conviction. At the hearing neither the testimony that the delivered substance was marijuana nor the judgment was objected to as hearsay.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. Gary Keenan, for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Everett L. REDING v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 82-97\n641 S.W.2d 24\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 1, 1982\nW. Gary Keenan, for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0288-01",
  "first_page_order": 308,
  "last_page_order": 309
}