{
  "id": 1748076,
  "name": "Garland TRICE v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF",
  "name_abbreviation": "Trice v. City of Pine Bluff",
  "decision_date": "1983-02-14",
  "docket_number": "82-233",
  "first_page": "405",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "278 Ark. 405"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "645 S.W.2d 950"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1169,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.837,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.160907657597764e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3977584100854442
    },
    "sha256": "5a1e22381ec5c5f9bf7e0163fa391abe7498e5cf88232b8d0c563c01d534f0dc",
    "simhash": "1:db8d12d0db03fd85",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:48:23.352095+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Garland TRICE v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellee\u2019s motion to strike the appellant\u2019s brief, as having been filed too late, was denied, but while the motion was under submission the time for the appellee to file its brief expired. The appellee relies upon the latter fact to justify its present motion for permission to file its brief after its due date.\nIt has been the court\u2019s understanding, and that of the clerk, that one who moves to strike an adversary\u2019s brief should protect his position by incorporating in, or attaching to, the motion a request for an extension of brief time if the motion should be denied. Otherwise the mere filing of such a motion to strike would in itself extend the movant\u2019s brief time. Our practice, however, has not been set out in a published rule or order. For that reason the appellee\u2019s motion to file a belated brief is granted, but in the future movants in a similar position must protect themselves by a timely request for an extention of their brief time.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Othello C. Cross, for appellant.",
      "Robert Tolson, Jr., City Atty., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Garland TRICE v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF\n82-233\n645 S.W.2d 950\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 14, 1983\nOthello C. Cross, for appellant.\nRobert Tolson, Jr., City Atty., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0405-01",
  "first_page_order": 435,
  "last_page_order": 435
}