{
  "id": 1748050,
  "name": "Robyn MASINGILL v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Masingill v. State",
  "decision_date": "1983-03-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 83-15",
  "first_page": "641",
  "last_page": "642",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "278 Ark. 641"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "648 S.W.2d 62"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "267 Ark. 86",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1719781
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/267/0086-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "278 Ark. 65",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1748046
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/278/0065-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ark. App. 90",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6137494
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/7/0090-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 902,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.85,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4705233780038913
    },
    "sha256": "afd76151d996f3ddc2206295073c1d9ef514464ed71afdd48c01ada1355b6708",
    "simhash": "1:71ee3e990527d32c",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:48:23.352095+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robyn MASINGILL v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe Court of Appeals reversed appellant\u2019s conviction of tampering with evidence. Masingill v. State, 7 Ark. App. 90, 644 S.W.2d 614 (1983). We granted the State\u2019s petition to review that reversal. After carefully studying the issues presented and the record, we are of the view that the petition was granted under a misconception. Consequently, we dismiss the petition. As we have said, a denial of a petition for review does not imply approval or disapproval of the decision. Wilson v. City of Pine Bluff, 278 Ark. 65, 643 S.W.2d 569 (1983); Moose v. Gregory, 267 Ark. 86, 590 S.W.2d 662(1979).\nPetition dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Felver A. Rowell, Tom Donovan, and John Wesley Hall, Jr., for petitioner.",
      "Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Victra L. Fewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robyn MASINGILL v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 83-15\n648 S.W.2d 62\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 21, 1983\nFelver A. Rowell, Tom Donovan, and John Wesley Hall, Jr., for petitioner.\nSteve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Victra L. Fewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0641-01",
  "first_page_order": 671,
  "last_page_order": 672
}