{
  "id": 1879949,
  "name": "Duford TAYLOR et al v. Jerry PATTERSON, et al",
  "name_abbreviation": "Taylor v. Patterson",
  "decision_date": "1984-06-11",
  "docket_number": "84-103",
  "first_page": "11",
  "last_page": "11",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "283 Ark. 11"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "670 S.W.2d 444"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "267 Ark. 595",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1719881
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/267/0595-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1089,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.869,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.9690639993462012e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7390786103745817
    },
    "sha256": "1213867259e5b7beefdb75b45321deeac9f168f7431c6364370d9d72a82d2c55",
    "simhash": "1:43d6aefd26447176",
    "word_count": 175
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:00:41.772495+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Duford TAYLOR et al v. Jerry PATTERSON, et al"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman, Justice.\nOn appeal the appellants argue only that Act 656 of 1983, which sets the minimum salaries of the Marshall, Arkansas, municipal court judge and clerk, is unconstitutional in that it deprives the rural citizens of Searcy County equal protection and due process under the law. That contention was not raised below. The only constitutional argument below was in the appellants\u2019 answer where they averred that Act 656 was special or local legislation in violation of Amendment 14 to the Arkansas Constitution.\nThe trial court\u2019s decision that Searcy County is liable to pay one-half of the minimum salary requirements of Act 656 is affirmed because we do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal, even those arguments that are constitutional in nature. Sweeney v. Sweeney, 267 Ark. 595, 593 S.W.2d 21 (1980).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Clay Brazil, for appellants.",
      "Jerry D. Patterson, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Duford TAYLOR et al v. Jerry PATTERSON, et al\n84-103\n670 S.W.2d 444\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 11, 1984\n[Rehearing denied July 16, 1984.]\nWilliam Clay Brazil, for appellants.\nJerry D. Patterson, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0011-01",
  "first_page_order": 33,
  "last_page_order": 33
}