{
  "id": 1880017,
  "name": "Robert Edward TROUTT v. Judge John LANGSTON and Tommy ROBINSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Troutt v. Langston",
  "decision_date": "1984-08-21",
  "docket_number": "CR 84-141",
  "first_page": "220",
  "last_page": "220",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "283 Ark. 220"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "675 S.W.2d 625"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "257 Ark. 112",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8717978
      ],
      "year": 1974,
      "opinion_index": 1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/257/0112-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1010,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.813,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.8651142789705816e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8420467757000505
    },
    "sha256": "d77ec8d6871dc50c07ab54a015fa3c5e4b6ec3773c0334864978d0748af948e6",
    "simhash": "1:d3d6bfc37cbd0b34",
    "word_count": 171
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:00:41.772495+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Adkisson, C.J., Purtle and Hays, JJ., concur.",
      "George Rose Smith, J., dissents."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Robert Edward TROUTT v. Judge John LANGSTON and Tommy ROBINSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Temporary Writ of Mandamus is granted. The bondsman may surrender the defendant without cause pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 43-716 (Repl. 1977) only if the consideration for making the bond is returned to the defendant.\nAdkisson, C.J., Purtle and Hays, JJ., concur.\nGeorge Rose Smith, J., dissents.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      },
      {
        "text": "George Rose Smith, Justice,\ndissenting. I think the bondsman had an absolute right to avoid possible liability by surrendering the petitioner to the jailer. Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 43-716; Craig v. State, 257 Ark. 112 (1974). The petitioner might have raised the question, in the Court below, of his entitlement to a return of the money he paid the bondsman, but that question was not raised below and is not before us on a petition for a Writ of Mandamus.",
        "type": "dissent",
        "author": "George Rose Smith, Justice,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Guy Jones, Jr., for petitioner.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert Edward TROUTT v. Judge John LANGSTON and Tommy ROBINSON\nCR 84-141\n675 S.W.2d 625\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered August 21, 1984\nGuy Jones, Jr., for petitioner.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0220-01",
  "first_page_order": 250,
  "last_page_order": 250
}