{
  "id": 1878664,
  "name": "Gary Lee McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDonald v. State",
  "decision_date": "1984-12-10",
  "docket_number": "CR 84-103",
  "first_page": "201",
  "last_page": "201",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "284 Ark. 201"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "680 S.W.2d 703"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "281 Ark. 324",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1742295
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/281/0324-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1315,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.843,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3462124625798647
    },
    "sha256": "521fd5d9db5be9f831bc0b41d7cde615b4be037eb7a59916dcb9da1a44e4ab21",
    "simhash": "1:6ae8c22654805b34",
    "word_count": 219
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:32.164820+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Gary Lee McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Robert H. Dudley, Justice.\nIn a trial to the court, the appellant was found guilty of aggravated robbery and theft of property. Next, the court found that appellant previously had been convicted of more than one, but less than four, felonies and imposed enhanced sentences of forty and five years. See Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 41-1001 (Repl. 1977 and Supp. 1983). Appellant contends that the trial court committed error in considering, for enhancement purposes, a prior conviction in which the state did not prove that appellant had been represented by counsel.\nAt trial, the court asked appellant\u2019s counsel, \u201cIs there any contention that he wasn\u2019t represented by counsel at any of these convictions?\u201d Counsel replied, \u201cNo, Your Honor. I think the only contention that we would have is that some of these are awfully old.\u201d Having failed to raise the issue below, the point is waived, and cannot be considered for the first time on appeal. Hefley v. State, 281 Ark. 324, 663 S.W.2d 732 (1984).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Robert H. Dudley, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William R. Simpson, Public Def\u00e9nder, andHoward W. Koopman, Chief Deputy, by: Deborah R. Sailings, Deputy Public Defender.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Patricia G. Cherry, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Gary Lee McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 84-103\n680 S.W.2d 703\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 10, 1984\nWilliam R. Simpson, Public Def\u00e9nder, andHoward W. Koopman, Chief Deputy, by: Deborah R. Sailings, Deputy Public Defender.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Patricia G. Cherry, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0201-01",
  "first_page_order": 229,
  "last_page_order": 229
}