{
  "id": 1878612,
  "name": "Dr. Helen S. SHAEFER v. James Franklin McGHEE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shaefer v. McGhee",
  "decision_date": "1984-12-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "370",
  "last_page": "370",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "284 Ark. 370"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "681 S.W.2d 353"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1252,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.799,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.747644260677765e-08,
      "percentile": 0.45554296794909666
    },
    "sha256": "af430093ffd2fef0fa03c7d88be06896a1ada4cea169bfda95ac13c517b378d1",
    "simhash": "1:d0725c742bebfea7",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:32.164820+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dr. Helen S. SHAEFER v. James Franklin McGHEE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe clerk of the court refused to file the record in this case because of uncertainty about whether the notice of appeal, filed on July 6, was timely. The judgment bore conflicting filing stamps, a somewhat inconspicuous one reading \u201cFiled May 21,1984\u2019 \u2019 and a more prominent one reading \u201cFiled & Recorded June 7, 1984.\u201d We remanded the question to the circuit judge, who determined that the judgment was \u201cfiled of record\u201d on June 7. That finding, too, is not without ambiguity, but we think it proper to let the record be filed.\nThe doubt, however, should not have arisen. The time for filing the notice of appeal runs from the date the judgment or decree is filed in the circuit or chancery clerk\u2019s office, not from its recordation. Hence the filing date should be clearly stamped on the document. If the date of recording is also to be stamped, the stamp should not include the word \u201cfiled.\u201d All circuit and chancery court clerks are directed to conform their practice to this opinion, a copy of which will be forwarded to them by the Judicial Department.\nRule granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Janies Smedley, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dr. Helen S. SHAEFER v. James Franklin McGHEE\n681 S.W.2d 353\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 21, 1984\nJanies Smedley, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0370-01",
  "first_page_order": 400,
  "last_page_order": 400
}