{
  "id": 1878658,
  "name": "POPE COUNTY v. Alex STREETT and James K. YOUNG",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pope County v. Streett",
  "decision_date": "1985-01-21",
  "docket_number": "84-192",
  "first_page": "416",
  "last_page": "417",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "284 Ark. 416"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "682 S.W.2d 749"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "267 Ark. 595",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1719881
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/267/0595-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "283 Ark. 11",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1879949
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/283/0011-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1665,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.831,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.63454121895651e-08,
      "percentile": 0.45098285652947334
    },
    "sha256": "9e28241656c119ffea5e0609d2bab6817481403475413820f8fdb3a5c716f289",
    "simhash": "1:e236d00e7f21c7b1",
    "word_count": 264
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:32.164820+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "POPE COUNTY v. Alex STREETT and James K. YOUNG"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "David Newbern, Judge.\nThe appellant county asserts the unconstitutionality of Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 43-2419 (Repl. 1979). Our jurisdiction thus is based on Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29(1) (c).\nThe judgment required the county to pay pursuant to \u00a7 43-2419 attorney fees to the appellees for representing indigent defendants. The case was submitted to the circuit court on a stipulation of facts. The stipulation notes the contention of the county that the \u201cstatute is unconstitutional.\u201d\nNothing in the abstract or the record shows that the appellant gave the trial court any reason for holding the statute unconstitutional. In this court, however, the appellant argues that in a case in which a fine upon conviction goes to the city the statute requiring the county to pay fees to court appointed defenders of indigents violates Ark. Const, amend. 14 which prohibits local legislation, violates the state and federal constitutional requirements for equal protection and violates the constitutional requirement of separation of powers.\nWe will not consider constitutional arguments raised for the first time on appeal, Taylor v. Patterson, 283 Ark. 11, 670 S.W.2d 444 (1984), even though the trial court may have been made generally aware of the contention of unconstitutionality of legislation or may have received other arguments of unconstitutionality. Sweeney v. Sweeney, 267 Ark. 595, 593 S.W.2d 21 (1980).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "David Newbern, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: RandelK. Miller, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.",
      "No response by appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "POPE COUNTY v. Alex STREETT and James K. YOUNG\n84-192\n682 S.W.2d 749\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 21, 1985\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: RandelK. Miller, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.\nNo response by appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0416-01",
  "first_page_order": 446,
  "last_page_order": 447
}