{
  "id": 1877739,
  "name": "William NATZKE v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE (STATE of Arkansas)",
  "name_abbreviation": "Natzke v. City of Fayetteville",
  "decision_date": "1985-02-25",
  "docket_number": "CR 84-183",
  "first_page": "88",
  "last_page": "88",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "285 Ark. 88"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "684 S.W.2d 264"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "283 Ark. 425",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1879959
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/283/0425-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "284 Ark. 396",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1878686
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/284/0396-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 81,
    "char_count": 669,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.826,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06896927195369305
    },
    "sha256": "1f813e283f8acac23a5ab8a3abbc98455b09fbfcbe87e60ef0efb8bd5343136f",
    "simhash": "1:7b0c98011c8e3f2b",
    "word_count": 111
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:39.025760+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William NATZKE v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE (STATE of Arkansas)"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant was convicted of DWI under Act 549 of 1983. On appeal his single assignment of error is that the act violates the separation of powers doctrine under the Arkansas Constitution. That argument has been considered and rejected. Sparrow v. State, 284 Ark. 396, 683 S.W.2d 218 (1985) and Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425, 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984).\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Linzay & Froelich, by: LeeH. Linsay, Jr., for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Patricia G. Cherry, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William NATZKE v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE (STATE of Arkansas)\nCR 84-183\n684 S.W.2d 264\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 25, 1985\nLinzay & Froelich, by: LeeH. Linsay, Jr., for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Patricia G. Cherry, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0088-01",
  "first_page_order": 112,
  "last_page_order": 112
}