{
  "id": 1877712,
  "name": "Ronald McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDonald v. State",
  "decision_date": "1985-04-29",
  "docket_number": "CR 85-75",
  "first_page": "482",
  "last_page": "482",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "285 Ark. 482"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "688 S.W.2d 302"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1400,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.856,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1899039996582867e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5911336915781576
    },
    "sha256": "b94a72b81a8ceeb8e75785e2206a74ced9d4ff02d65c39da122616e942799cd8",
    "simhash": "1:6d4b126e23958315",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:39.025760+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ronald McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPetitioner Ronald McDonald pleaded guilty on February 18, 1982, to aggravated robbery. On March 6, 1985, he filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis which the trial court denied. Petitioner filed a timely notice of appeal; but upon being advised by an attorney that a petition for writ of certiorari was the proper means to challenge the denial of a petition for writ of error coram nobis, he also filed the petition now before us.\nPetitioner\u2019s so-called petition for writ of error coram nobis raised grounds to vacate his guilty plea which are covered by A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. Petitioner states in the error coram nobis petition that it was filed instead of a Rule 37 petition because Rule 37 was no longer available to him, apparently because more than three years had passed since his guilty plea was entered. Rule 37.2(c).\nObviously a petition for writ of error coram nobis cannot be used as a substitute for a Rule 37 petition. Since no grounds were alleged which would entitle petitioner to any relief under a petition for writ of error coram nobis, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.\nPetition denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari; denied.",
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ronald McDONALD v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 85-75\n688 S.W.2d 302\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 29, 1985\nPro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari; denied.\nAppellant, pro se.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0482-01",
  "first_page_order": 512,
  "last_page_order": 512
}