{
  "id": 1875448,
  "name": "Robert Steven OSGOOD and Anthony Gerald TEMPLE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Osgood v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-05-12",
  "docket_number": "CR 85-45 and CR 85-46",
  "first_page": "65",
  "last_page": "66",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "289 Ark. 65"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "709 S.W.2d 401"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "287 Ark. 61",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1876616
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1985,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/287/0061-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1751,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.897,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0689213927144015
    },
    "sha256": "1d02b9fa090629ef35a31c33c73870c2f7150a6ca4f265e025ceeb214c4a6dd0",
    "simhash": "1:3b2e9c38617a5c98",
    "word_count": 286
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:22:34.211418+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Purtle, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Robert Steven OSGOOD and Anthony Gerald TEMPLE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe petitioners, Robert Steven Osgood and Anthony Gerald Temple, were charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 82-2617(a)(l)(iv). Both petitioners moved to quash the felony information, alleging that the crime charged was a misdemeanor, rather than a felony. The circuit judge denied both motions. The petitioners then filed writs of prohibition in this court, claiming that the Bradley Circuit Court was without jurisdiction to try them for a misdemeanor. We granted petitioners\u2019 motions to consolidate their cases since they presented the same issue. We then granted a temporary writ of prohibition on March 4, 1985, and allowed the parties to brief the issue.\nSubsequently, the appellee filed a motion to reconsider the issuance of the temporary writ of prohibition. We granted that motion on April 1, 1985.\nWe decided the issue raised in this case in Dollar v. State, 287 Ark. 61, 697 S.W.2d 868 (1985) where we found the Legislature enacted \u00a7 82-2617 to upgrade the penalties for offenses which were already felonies, and the Legislature intended no change in the felony status of those offenses.\nAccordingly, the temporary writ of prohibition is dissolved, the petitioners\u2019 motion for permanent writ of prohibition is denied, and the case is remanded to circuit court for trial on the merits.\nPurtle, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hani W. Hasham, for appellant, Osgood.",
      "Gibson & Gibson, P.A., by: R. Bynum Gibson, for appellant, Temple.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert Steven OSGOOD and Anthony Gerald TEMPLE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 85-45 and CR 85-46\n709 S.W.2d 401\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 12, 1986\nHani W. Hasham, for appellant, Osgood.\nGibson & Gibson, P.A., by: R. Bynum Gibson, for appellant, Temple.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0065-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 92
}