{
  "id": 1875446,
  "name": "James CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clark v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-06-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "382",
  "last_page": "383",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "600 S.W.2d 1",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1715487
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/268/0192-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "268 Ark. 191",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1715311
      ],
      "year": 1980,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/268/0191-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1575,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.901,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.9852528243131883e-06,
      "percentile": 0.997408922296242
    },
    "sha256": "ae0844358dafb44571b5a3bcf2eb95886e12eac45eb76277783fe725427b5b09",
    "simhash": "1:fd48ae769b8bfb1a",
    "word_count": 273
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:22:34.211418+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe judgment of conviction was entered on November 7,1985. Notice of appeal was filed December 3,1985. The record was thus due in the clerk\u2019s office within ninety days of the filing of the notice of appeal. The record was tendered on June 2, 1986, some three months late.\nThe appellant\u2019s counsel, Mary Ann Gunn, contends the circuit judge entered an order extending the time for filing the record, and she presents his affidavit to that effect. She also presents her own affidavit showing she gave the extension order to her law clerk to file at the clerk\u2019s office. She presents her law clerk\u2019s affidavit to the effect that he gave the order to a deputy clerk for filing. She does not present the order or a file-marked copy of it.\nIn similar circumstances we have held we will not permit a record to be filed unless the attorney assumes full responsibility for presenting it late. Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). A statement that it was someone else\u2019s fault or no one\u2019s fault will not suffice. Moore v. State, 268 Ark. 191, 600 S.W.2d 1 (1980).\nIf the appellant\u2019s attorney files a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not perfecting the appeal, then the motion will be granted. That negligence will be duly noted and a copy of the opinion granting the motion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hanks, Gunn & Borgognoni, by: Mary Ann Gunn, for appellant.",
      "No response by appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas\n711 S.W.2d 162\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 30, 1986\nHanks, Gunn & Borgognoni, by: Mary Ann Gunn, for appellant.\nNo response by appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0382-01",
  "first_page_order": 408,
  "last_page_order": 409
}