{
  "id": 1873677,
  "name": "James Edwin CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clark v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-10-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "128",
  "last_page": "129",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "290 Ark. 128"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "717 S.W.2d 491"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "711 S.W.2d 162",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1875396,
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0384-01",
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875446
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0382-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 957,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.898,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.635120475807831e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5276035398202752
    },
    "sha256": "a0ddc867c3bd954d9e718f642a011aa98b95c89903962bc6c968814b0eb4430f",
    "simhash": "1:3ef2ed51110b0a69",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:33:16.506369+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Edwin CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, James Edwin Clark, by his attorney, Mary Ann Gunn, has filed a second motion for rule on the clerk.\nWe denied the first motion because appellant\u2019s attorney did no.t take responsibility for tendering the record late. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986).\nThis second motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney accepts full responsibility for not perfecting the appeal on time.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hanks, Gunn & Borgognoni, by: Mary Ann Gunn, for appellant.",
      "No objection."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Edwin CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas\n717 S.W.2d 491\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 13, 1986\nHanks, Gunn & Borgognoni, by: Mary Ann Gunn, for appellant.\nNo objection."
  },
  "file_name": "0128-01",
  "first_page_order": 154,
  "last_page_order": 155
}