{
  "id": 1873788,
  "name": "Richard Wayne SNELL v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Snell v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-10-20",
  "docket_number": "CR 85-206",
  "first_page": "184",
  "last_page": "185",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "290 Ark. 184"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "717 S.W.2d 818"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1341,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.912,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3663138984593364e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6373526024104108
    },
    "sha256": "e72299b4157196d758330cc337d481658fa822472796c08742091aa933054d79",
    "simhash": "1:5a35ba03db699a22",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:33:16.506369+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Richard Wayne SNELL v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant was convicted of the capital felony murder of William Stump and sentenced to death by lethal injection. Among his many points of error is a claim that information was withheld in violation of A.R.Cr.P. Rule 17.1(d) tending to negate the guilt of the appellant. The information was allegedly contained in a statement of John Thomas Holmer. The state denies the claim.\nDuring the trial the state produced the Holmer statement for the trial court\u2019s inspection. When the trial judge pronounced the statement free of exculpatory information the defense asked that it be appended to the record so that it could be reviewed on appeal. That request was denied.\nIn view of the nature of the case, we think the proper course would have been to include the material in the record and we now order that the record on appeal be supplemented to include the statement of John Thomas Holmer. See Rule 6(e), Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The parties may petition this Court for permission to file a supplemental brief.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attaway & Shumaker, by: Rick C. Shumaker; and Dowd, Harrelson & Moore, by: Marshall Moore, for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Richard Wayne SNELL v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 85-206\n717 S.W.2d 818\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 20, 1986\nAttaway & Shumaker, by: Rick C. Shumaker; and Dowd, Harrelson & Moore, by: Marshall Moore, for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0184-01",
  "first_page_order": 210,
  "last_page_order": 211
}