{
  "id": 1873692,
  "name": "Jim Arthur WARD v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ward v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-10-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "185",
  "last_page": "186",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "290 Ark. 185"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "717 S.W.2d 492"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 838,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.891,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06889166125129303
    },
    "sha256": "f41f1c2506ab49da6666b632ad9a773bf406c8ccf30ebccfe9ba3ba66a1541a1",
    "simhash": "1:33cef257e0371e28",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:33:16.506369+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jim Arthur WARD v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Jim Arthur Ward, by his attorney, Bill E. Ross, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late because the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court, see Ark. R. App. P. 5(a), was not extended by a new trial motion with respect to which no record was made. See Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bill E. Ross, for appellant.",
      "No objection."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jim Arthur WARD v. STATE of Arkansas\n717 S.W.2d 492\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 20, 1986\nBill E. Ross, for appellant.\nNo objection."
  },
  "file_name": "0185-01",
  "first_page_order": 211,
  "last_page_order": 212
}