{
  "id": 1871159,
  "name": "Lige ROBINSON and Clayton KIDD v. Jerry Wayne ABBOTT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson v. Abbott",
  "decision_date": "1987-07-06",
  "docket_number": "87-57",
  "first_page": "630",
  "last_page": "632",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "292 Ark. 630"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "731 S.W.2d 782"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "123 F.2d 174",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "F.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1093158
      ],
      "year": 1942,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/f2d/123/0174-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "283 Ark. 143",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1879928
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/283/0143-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "290 Ark. 589",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1873701
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1987,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/290/0589-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "279 Ark. 384",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1746935
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/279/0384-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "241 Ark. 353",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1724119
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/241/0353-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "276 Ark. 185",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1751444
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/276/0185-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "280 Ark. 228",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1744899
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1983,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/280/0228-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "681 S.W.2d 385",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1878617
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/284/0299-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "284 Ark. 318",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1878625
      ],
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/284/0318-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 272,
    "char_count": 3346,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.922,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.191514379656558e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47571306280790887
    },
    "sha256": "febbaa6fec77c6f4d4f952ac9dbd432c1cbafc4c9f08cdd4c2f233515a2323be",
    "simhash": "1:bbcb804d41dcdc9a",
    "word_count": 549
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:51:01.167469+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Glaze, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Lige ROBINSON and Clayton KIDD v. Jerry Wayne ABBOTT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Steele Hays, Justice.\nAppellants ask us to overturn a jury verdict and remand for a new trial because the issue of punitive damages was improperly submitted to the jury. The jury refused to award punitive damages, but did return a verdict for the plaintiff, now the appellee, of $50,000 in compensatory damages. While we agree with appellants that the proof was entirely insufficient with respect to punitive damages, we cannot agree the error requires remand.\nAppellee Jerry Wayne Abbott sued appellants Lige Robinson and Clayton Kidd for injuries arising from a motor vehicle collision. Robinson and Kidd admitted that Robinson caused the collision and that he was Kidd\u2019s employee, but denied any grounds for punitive damages.\nBefore the jury was impaneled the trial judge listened to the plaintiffs proof relative to punitive damages. It consisted essentially of testimony which would clearly sustain a finding of negligence, but fell far short of establishing willful, wanton misconduct. The trial judge informed counsel for plaintiff he could \u201crisk\u201d making proof on that issue, but could not introduce proof of the defendants\u2019 net worth. As we have mentioned, the jury rejected the claim for punitive damages but upheld the claim for compensatory damages.\nWe agree with appellants that it was error to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury on the proof of mere ordinary negligence. Even if evidence of Robinson\u2019s conduct could be considered gross negligence, an arguable point, it would not have sustained an award of punitive damages. Wallace v. Dustin, 284 Ark. 318, 681 S.W.2d 385 (1984).\nEven so, we have repeatedly said that it is only harmful, thus reversible, error to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury where there is proof of the defendant\u2019s net worth. In KARK-TV v. Simon, 280 Ark. 228, 656 S.W.2d 702 (1983) we summarized the rule:\nThe jury\u2019s refusal to award punitive damages would ordinarily render the error harmless, but appellees were permitted to present evidence of the appellant\u2019s net worth. We have held on a number of occasions that where the issue of punitive damages is erroneously submitted to the jury, together with the defendant\u2019s financial condition, an award of compensatory damages is tainted and cannot stand. Dalrymple v. Fields, 276 Ark. 185, 633 S.W.2d 362 (1982); Life and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Padgett, 241 Ark. 353, 407 S.W.2d 728 (1966). (Emphasis added).\nWe restated that principle in Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co., 279 Ark. 384, 653 S.W.2d 128 (1983).\nHere, there was no proof of net worth, nor any showing of prejudice, and we do not reverse for error which does not result in prejudice. Peoples Bank v. Wallace, 290 Ark. 589, 721 S.W.2d 659 (1987); Ricketts v. Ferrell, 283 Ark. 143, 671 S.W.2d 753 (1984); Rule 61, Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. Our Rule 61 is identical to FRCP 61. \u201cThe philosophy behind this rule is that proceedings should not be disturbed because of a technical error which resulted in no prejudice. Gutshall v. Wood, 123 F.2d 174 (C.A. 1942).\u201d Reporter\u2019s Notes to ARCP Rule 61.\nAffirmed.\nGlaze, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Steele Hays, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Laser, Sharp & Mayes, P.A., for appellant.",
      "Lovell, Arnold & Nalley, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lige ROBINSON and Clayton KIDD v. Jerry Wayne ABBOTT\n87-57\n731 S.W.2d 782\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered July 6, 1987\nLaser, Sharp & Mayes, P.A., for appellant.\nLovell, Arnold & Nalley, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0630-01",
  "first_page_order": 660,
  "last_page_order": 662
}