{
  "id": 1895751,
  "name": "Lynn D. SUTTON, Luther Sutton, and Rose Agnes Sutton, His Wife v. CENTRAL PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sutton v. Central Production Credit Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1988-01-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "335",
  "last_page": "336",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "294 Ark. 335"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "745 S.W.2d 588"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1306,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.902,
    "sha256": "06fb880d13c32303e97d42f8d89c4f273981269c33d5a0dea9ea18d68aa8465e",
    "simhash": "1:0c5ae60004e9191a",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:12:05.889486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lynn D. SUTTON, Luther Sutton, and Rose Agnes Sutton, His Wife v. CENTRAL PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe court reporter in this case is Carl L. Arrington. The clerk refused to docket the transcript the petitioner tendered because it did not comply with the uniform standards set forth in our per curiam dated July 7, 1986.\nThe clerk was right in refusing the transcript. Mr. Arrington has been warned before, by letter from our clerk dated March 2, 1987, that his transcripts were not in compliance.\nThe petitioner\u2019s remedy is threefold. First, a complaint can be made to the judge that his court reporter is not preparing proper transcripts. A suggestion from him would probably prompt his court reporter to prepare a proper transcript. Second, a civil suit may be filed against the court reporter for damages for breach of contract and loss of the right to appeal. An alternative claim of negligence could be made. Third, a complaint may be filed with the Supreme Court Committee on Court Reporters. The Chairman is Circuit Judge Charles Eddy of Morrilton. The petitioner may seek all three remedies simultaneously, if he wishes.\nMotion denied without prejudice.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John Robert Graves, for petitioners.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lynn D. SUTTON, Luther Sutton, and Rose Agnes Sutton, His Wife v. CENTRAL PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION\n745 S.W.2d 588\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 19, 1988\nJohn Robert Graves, for petitioners.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0335-01",
  "first_page_order": 375,
  "last_page_order": 376
}