{
  "id": 1893780,
  "name": "David QUIGLEY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Quigley v. State",
  "decision_date": "1988-03-28",
  "docket_number": "RC 88-6",
  "first_page": "167",
  "last_page": "167",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "295 Ark. 167"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "747 S.W.2d 92"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 815,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.938,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06930249601424639
    },
    "sha256": "60d39b8e97fe0eddcd3b13248996c22d44f59075bfb8bc84b28ac85a52f7b5c1",
    "simhash": "1:3b526055f9071aa2",
    "word_count": 144
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:27.354550+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "David QUIGLEY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPetitioner, David Quigley, by his attorney, David M. Clark, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981); In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David M. Clark, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "David QUIGLEY v. STATE of Arkansas\nRC 88-6\n747 S.W.2d 92\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 28, 1988\nDavid M. Clark, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0167-01",
  "first_page_order": 191,
  "last_page_order": 191
}