{
  "id": 1891338,
  "name": "Clayton HAMILTON v. JEFFREY STONE CO., et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.",
  "decision_date": "1988-11-07",
  "docket_number": "88-168",
  "first_page": "24",
  "last_page": "24",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "297 Ark. 24"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "759 S.W.2d 792"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "25 Ark. App. 66",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6137655
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1988,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/25/0066-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "293 Ark. 499",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1869733
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1987,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/293/0499-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 995,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.934,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4098437785368954
    },
    "sha256": "5894fbb2759a2e9aee33c80f2f1537c5b64c452975acaf3310a2543fa9c25d28",
    "simhash": "1:1def66aa258b1450",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:24:39.933112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Clayton HAMILTON v. JEFFREY STONE CO., et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Darrell Hickman, Justice.\nThis case was before us last year. We remanded it to the court of appeals to decide the constitutionality of the time limitation placed on filing a workers\u2019 compensation disability claim when disability results from silicosis. Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co., 293 Ark. 499, 739 S.W.2d 161 (1987) . The court of appeals held that the appellant\u2019s proof was not sufficient to show that the limitations period violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the U. S. Constitution. Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co., 25 Ark. App. 66, 752 S.W.2d 288 (1988).\nAgain we were asked to review the decision of the court of appeals, and we granted the petition. Upon further study, we have determined that review was improvidently granted.\nReview denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Darrell Hickman, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "The McMath Law Firm, by: Eileen W. Harrison, for appellant.",
      "Michael E. Ryburn, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Clayton HAMILTON v. JEFFREY STONE CO., et al.\n88-168\n759 S.W.2d 792\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 7, 1988\nThe McMath Law Firm, by: Eileen W. Harrison, for appellant.\nMichael E. Ryburn, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0024-01",
  "first_page_order": 50,
  "last_page_order": 50
}