{
  "id": 1891435,
  "name": "WEST APARTMENTS, INC. v. Leland BOOTH, d/b/a Booth Home Improvements",
  "name_abbreviation": "West Apartments, Inc. v. Booth",
  "decision_date": "1988-12-05",
  "docket_number": "88-156",
  "first_page": "247",
  "last_page": "250",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "297 Ark. 247"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "760 S.W.2d 861"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174931
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0521-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 327,
    "char_count": 6414,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.904,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.4175825920492627e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9204121553032628
    },
    "sha256": "6ffb4f47335a3b9cf37c9a24288c8d811f770e9e866abc63a6a1df7a37539eee",
    "simhash": "1:9d3f50555a56dcf6",
    "word_count": 1107
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:24:39.933112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WEST APARTMENTS, INC. v. Leland BOOTH, d/b/a Booth Home Improvements"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Steele Hays, Justice.\nThis small claims case originated in municipal court. The only question is whether or not an appeal to circuit court was timely filed.\nLeland Booth, appellee, filed a small claims action against West Apartments, appellant, in the Ft. Smith Municipal Court on October 12, 1987. Appellant was served by certified mail and the complaint and summons were received by appellant\u2019s agent for service on October 15, 1987.\nSubsequently, a default judgment was signed by Municipal Judge John Settle which recites that the cause came to be heard on November 3, 1987. There is no date stamp on the default judgment showing when it was filed with the clerk of the court. However, on the official docket sheet of the municipal court is an entry for \u201c11-3-87, Default Judgment,\u201d and the default judgment itself has the date of November 3, 1987 typed in on the designated date line on the document.\nOn December 7, 1987, appellant\u2019s attorney attempted to take an appeal to the circuit court but was told by the municipal court clerk that it could not be done because more than thirty days had elapsed from the date of the default judgment. On December 8, 1987, appellant filed a notice of appeal to circuit court. On December 9, 1987, appellant filed a letter with Judge Settle pointing out that there was no date or \u201cfiled\u201d stamp on the judgment, and that the language of Rule 9(a) of the Arkansas Inferior Court Rules, providing for appeal to circuit court, is similar to Rule 4(e) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides that time for appeal runs from the date of filing.\nApparently in response to this contention, the municipal judge instructed the clerk to process the appeal to circuit court, as the docket notes, \u201c12-9-87 Judge said to accept the appeal.\u201d The transcript was prepared and filed with the circuit clerk on December 11, 1987.\nAppellee filed a motion for summary judgment in circuit court contending that the circuit court had no jurisdiction because the appeal was not timely filed. On March 28,1988, the circuit court entered an order finding it did not have jurisdiction because the appeal was not timely filed, and remanded the case to municipal court. It is from the order dismissing the appeal that appellant brings this appeal.\nAppellant\u2019s argument essentially relies on applying ARAP to the procedures in inferior courts. ARAP 4(e) and our case law make it clear that the time for appeal runs from the time the judgment is filed, Caskey v. Pickett, 272 Ark. 521, 615 S.W.2d 359 (1981). ARAP 4 deals with the time that an appeal must be taken, and specifically provides that an appeal must be filed within thirty days of the \u201centry of the judgment,\u201d ARAP 4(a), and that for the purposes of this rule, \u201cA judgment. . .is entered . . . when it is filed with the clerk of the court in which the claim was tried.\u201d ARAP 4(e).\nAICR 9 is similar to ARAP 4 and provides:\n(a) Time for Taking Appeal. All appeals in civil cases from inferior courts to circuit courts must be filed in the office of the clerk of the particular circuit court having jurisdiction of the appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the judgment. [Emphasis added.]\nAICR 10 provides:\nWhere applicable and unless otherwise specifically modified herein, the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and rules of evidence shall apply to the govern matters of procedure and evidence in the inferior courts of this State.\nTherefore, appellant argues, we should apply ARAP 4(e) to determine the time for appeal, as there is no similar provision in the AICR. Given that application, the argument continues, the judgment was never \u201centered,\u201d or filed, as required by ARAP 4(e), and the time from entry of judgment never began to run and the appeal was timely. We disagree.\nWhile ARAP 4(e) establishes that a judgment is entered when it is filed with the clerk of a circuit, chancery or probate court, the procedure is decidedly different from the manner in which a judgment is entered in inferior court proceedings. That difference becomes quickly apparent by a review of AICR 8 and 9, which provide in relevant part:\nRule 8:\n(a) By Default. When a defendant has failed to appear or plead within the time specified by Rule 4 hereof, a default judgment may be rendered against him.\n(b) Upon the Merits. Where the court has decided the case, it shall enter judgment in favor of the prevailing party for the relief to which he is deemed entitled.\n(c) Docket Entry. The court shall timely enter in the docket the date and amount of the judgment, whether rendered by default or upon the merits.\n(d) Judgment Lien. A judgment entered by an inferior court in this state shall not become a lien against any real property unless a certified copy of such judgment, showing the name of the judgment debtor, the date and amount thereof, shall be filed in the office of the circuit clerk of the county in which such land is situated.\n* * *\nRule 9:\n(a) Time for Taking Appeal. All appeals in civil cases from inferior courts to circuit court must be filed in the office of the clerk of the particular court having jurisdiction of the appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the judgment. (Emphasis added).\nThe foregoing rules, particularly Rule 8(c), reflect that an inferior court, such as the municipal court, enters any judgment it renders by entering, in a timely manner, the date and amount of the judgment in the court\u2019s docket. This specific procedure for entering judgments in an inferior court is in marked contrast to that applicable to courts of general jurisdiction under ARAP 4(e), where judgments are entered only when they are filed with the clerk of those courts.\nIn the instant case, it is clear that the Ft. Smith Municipal Court timely entered a default judgment against the appellant on the court\u2019s docket on November 3, 1987, and that more than thirty days had elapsed from that date before appellant attempted to file a notice of appeal. That being so, we conclude that the trial court was correct in finding it had no jurisdiction because appellant\u2019s attempted appeal was untimely.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Steele Hays, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Martin, Voter, Karr & Hutchinson, by: Charles Karr, for appellant.",
      "No brief filed."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WEST APARTMENTS, INC. v. Leland BOOTH, d/b/a Booth Home Improvements\n88-156\n760 S.W.2d 861\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 5, 1988\n[Rehearing denied January 9, 1989.]\nMartin, Voter, Karr & Hutchinson, by: Charles Karr, for appellant.\nNo brief filed."
  },
  "file_name": "0247-01",
  "first_page_order": 277,
  "last_page_order": 280
}