{
  "id": 1891379,
  "name": "Thomas Kevin TAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Taylor v. State",
  "decision_date": "1988-12-05",
  "docket_number": "RC 88-54",
  "first_page": "281",
  "last_page": "281",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "297 Ark. 281"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "760 S.W.2d 382"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 793,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.924,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06926330454014887
    },
    "sha256": "0b71c84181acab5c4f9d7d93995a1385a5a94612f1caf7cb49fc082c0100f059",
    "simhash": "1:b64b5c75c43a5ea8",
    "word_count": 138
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:24:39.933112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas Kevin TAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Thomas Kevin Taylor, by his attorney, Matt Keil, seeks reconsideration of his Motion for Rule on Clerk which we denied because the attorney did not admit error. In this petition he admits error in filing untimely notice of appeal. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Matt Keil, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas Kevin TAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas\nRC 88-54\n760 S.W.2d 382\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 5, 1988\nMatt Keil, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0281-01",
  "first_page_order": 317,
  "last_page_order": 317
}