{
  "id": 1891376,
  "name": "Charles E. PENNINGTON v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pennington v. Lockhart",
  "decision_date": "1989-01-17",
  "docket_number": "88-227",
  "first_page": "475",
  "last_page": "476",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "297 Ark. 475"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "763 S.W.2d 78"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "294 Ark. 185",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1895810
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1987,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/294/0185-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "283 Ark. 339",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1880012
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1984,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/283/0339-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 302",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8719911
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0302-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1339,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.924,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3217718642105666e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6268857759660892
    },
    "sha256": "a1a37dc6d48e6f65cc5975b9b5ec000626c84e5324d3c067dc69968704c0abc0",
    "simhash": "1:61130e27c12ff5b8",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:24:39.933112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles E. PENNINGTON v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Tom Glaze, Justice.\nAppellant brings this pro se appeal from the trial court\u2019s denial of appellant\u2019s petition for declaratory judgment requesting that his parole eligibility be correctly determined. He has failed to abstract any of the record. In addition, the three courts\u2019 sentencing orders needed to determine parole eligibility are omitted from the transcript.\nWe hold pro se litigants to the abstracting requirement of Rule 9 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986); Walker v. State, 283 Ark. 339, 676 S.W.2d 460 (1984). In the present case, appellant not only wholly ignored this court\u2019s abstracting requirement, but also he failed to privilege us with a record that contains the court orders necessary to determine the parole eligibility issue the appellant raises in this appeal. Accordingly, we are required to affirm pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9(e)(2).\nIn an earlier appeal, this court denied post-conviction relief to appellant. Pennington v. State, 294 Ark. 185, 741 S.W.2d 266 (1987).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Tom Glaze, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles E. PENNINGTON v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction\n88-227\n763 S.W.2d 78\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 17, 1989\nAppellant, pro se.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0475-01",
  "first_page_order": 511,
  "last_page_order": 512
}