{
  "id": 1889870,
  "name": "Joe Samuel BROWN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brown v. State",
  "decision_date": "1989-04-17",
  "docket_number": "CR 88-187",
  "first_page": "396",
  "last_page": "396",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "298 Ark. 396"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "767 S.W.2d 313"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "297 Ark. 57",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1891464
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1988,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/297/0057-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1004,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.889,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6009580095210184
    },
    "sha256": "6416c25b8374a325f3952529fadd5e61f343b3cf49c68b8ea97f0c67501de34d",
    "simhash": "1:59aa2544cbbf3b3a",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:53.094543+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joe Samuel BROWN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.\nAppellant Joe Samuel Brown pleaded guilty to first degree battery and was sentenced to a five-year term. He filed a Rule 37 petition for post-conviction relief, which was denied by Judge Berlin C. Jones without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Brown contends the Rule 37 court erred in failing to (1) conduct an evidentiary hearing; (2) obtain a transcript of prior proceedings; and (3) grant his petition.\nOrdinarily, the judgment or decree appealed from is an essential component of the abstract. Davis v. Wingfield, 297 Ark. 57, 759 S.W.2d 219 (1988). Because Brown did not abstract the court\u2019s order denying the petition, we must affirm. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9(d).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morris & Hodge, by: Henry C. Morris, for appellant.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jeannette Denhammcclendon, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joe Samuel BROWN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 88-187\n767 S.W.2d 313\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 17, 1989]\n[Rehearing denied May 15, 1989.]\nMorris & Hodge, by: Henry C. Morris, for appellant.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Jeannette Denhammcclendon, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0396-01",
  "first_page_order": 424,
  "last_page_order": 424
}