{
  "id": 1889841,
  "name": "Charles SUMMERS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Summers v. State",
  "decision_date": "1989-05-08",
  "docket_number": "RC 89-16",
  "first_page": "605",
  "last_page": "606",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "298 Ark. 605"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "771 S.W.2d 16"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 788,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.879,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06922893960227025
    },
    "sha256": "1c9a511f7e43e45c5b19f928ead724722c506427bcf16a6dc2bf5748dd045b72",
    "simhash": "1:3b04787da03f0a6a",
    "word_count": 138
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:53.094543+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles SUMMERS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Charles Summers, by his attorney, Lynn F. Plemmons, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lynn Plemmons, for appellant.",
      "No objection."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles SUMMERS v. STATE of Arkansas\nRC 89-16\n771 S.W.2d 16\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 8, 1989\nLynn Plemmons, for appellant.\nNo objection."
  },
  "file_name": "0605-01",
  "first_page_order": 641,
  "last_page_order": 642
}