{
  "id": 1884289,
  "name": "Bruce Lamont BAILEY v. A. L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bailey v. Lockhart",
  "decision_date": "1990-07-02",
  "docket_number": "90-85",
  "first_page": "606",
  "last_page": "608",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "302 Ark. 606"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "791 S.W.2d 372"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 7",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875319
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0007-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "779 S.W.2d 53",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "300 Ark. 383",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1886747
      ],
      "year": 1989,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/300/0383-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 2115,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.877,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0691073108895538
    },
    "sha256": "ea9e62761065357d8ffa11dc19973a4aa1f9f661eeb54c04425d0d9f32b532bc",
    "simhash": "1:077dbad5a53cac51",
    "word_count": 345
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:34:09.444418+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bruce Lamont BAILEY v. A. L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Otis H. Turner, Justice.\nThe appellant sought mandamus to require credit for time served earlier in the Department of Correction against a sentence he is presently serving. This appeal is from a denial of the appellant\u2019s petition. We find that the appellant\u2019s sentences and credits for time served have been correctly calculated, and we affirm.\nOn October 10, 1984, the appellant was convicted of kidnapping and rape and sentenced to two fifty-year terms, to run concurrently.\nOn October 25, 1984, he was convicted of robbery and sentenced to a term of ten years.\nThe appellant\u2019s kidnapping and rape convictions were reversed on appeal on October 14, 1985. Facing a retrial, the appellant, on November 5, 1985, pled guilty to the kidnapping and rape charges and was resentenced on that date to concurrent two-year terms, to run concurrently with the existing robbery term.\nIf the appellant had been incarcerated only for the kidnapping and rape charges from October 10, 1984, until the reversal on October 14,1985, the appellant would be entitled to a credit for the time served. However, from October 25, 1984, he was also serving a concurrent sentence for robbery and is therefore not entitled to credit while serving time on an unrelated charge. Humphrey v. State, 300 Ark. 383, 779 S.W.2d 53 (1989); McGirt v. State, 289 Ark. 7, 708 S.W.2d 620 (1986).\nThere is a fifteen-day hiatus between the original sentences for kidnapping and rape, which were imposed on October 10, 1984, and his conviction for robbery on October 25,1984. it is not clear from the record exactly how this was handled. However, the record clearly reflects that upon resentencing on the kidnapping and rape charges, the appellant was given credit for forty-two additional days against his sentence, which is presumed to include the fifteen days between October 10,1984, and October 25,1984.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Otis H. Turner, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Steve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: John D. Harris, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bruce Lamont BAILEY v. A. L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction\n90-85\n791 S.W.2d 372\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered July 2, 1990\nAppellant, pro se.\nSteve Clark, Att\u2019y Gen., by: John D. Harris, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0606-01",
  "first_page_order": 634,
  "last_page_order": 636
}