#### Kenneth D. TRAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 90-119

795 S.W.2d 361

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered October 1, 1990

Joe K. Hardin, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by; Sandra Bailey Moll, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Dale Price, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of breaking or entering, theft of property, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He raises six issues on appeal. Five of those issues involve direct attacks on his conviction. We consider only the sixth issue in which the appellant claims the trial court *288should have ordered a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel.

Less than thirty days after his conviction, the appellant filed a motion for a new trial asserting that his representation at trial had been inadequate. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.4. The motion was filed in . a timely manner and new counsel was appointed. However, the record does not reflect that the motion was ever acted upon by the trial court. Therefore, as in Mobbs v. State, 303 Ark. 98, 792 S.W.2d 601 (1990), we do not reach the merits of the case. We remand to the trial court for consideration of the post-conviction motion.

Remanded.