{
  "id": 1916813,
  "name": "Vickie SCARBROUGH v. CHEROKEE ENTERPRISES and Royal Insurance Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scarbrough v. Cherokee Enterprises",
  "decision_date": "1991-04-22",
  "docket_number": "91-54",
  "first_page": "295",
  "last_page": "296",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "305 Ark. 295"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "807 S.W.2d 468"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "295 Ark. 296",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1893770
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1988,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/295/0296-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "4 Ark. App. 52",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6137070
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "Glaze, J., Dissenting"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "Glaze, J., Dissenting"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/4/0052-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "292 Ark. 349",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1871383
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1987,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "352",
          "parenthetical": "Newbern, J., Concurring"
        },
        {
          "page": "726",
          "parenthetical": "Newbern, J., Concurring"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/292/0349-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ark. App. 139",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6653463
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1991,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/33/0139-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 1865,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.915,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06982318274154208
    },
    "sha256": "76e0d659f1dbda442db17ac7ab77db397338699084928b6c2f49ae68b017d35d",
    "simhash": "1:2058bcb54103d12b",
    "word_count": 301
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:53:54.224345+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Vickie SCARBROUGH v. CHEROKEE ENTERPRISES and Royal Insurance Company"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a decision of the Workers\u2019 Compensation Commission denying benefits to the petitioner, Vickie Scarbrough. In her petition seeking review of the Court of Appeals decision, Scarbrough v. Cherokee Enter., 33 Ark. App. 139, 803 S.W.2d 561 (1991), Ms. Scarbrough has raised an issue concerning the standard of review to be applied on appeal of workers\u2019 compensation cases. The Court of Appeals addressed the issue, pointing out that the standard of appellate court review of workers\u2019 compensation cases had been discussed, Webb v. Workers\u2019 Compensation Comm\u2019n, 292 Ark. 349, 352, 730 S.W.2d 222, 726 (1987) (Newbern, J., Concurring), see also Hamby v. Everett, 4 Ark. App. 52, 627 S.W.2d 266 (1982) (Glaze, J., Dissenting), but that the law making the commission the fact finding body and limiting the review to a substantial evidence standard remains the law. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Hooks, 295 Ark. 296, 749 S.W.2d 291 (1988).\nThe petition for review is granted, and the parties are directed to file supplemental briefs limited to discussion of the standard of review issue and the question whether an appellate court should be bound by a factual determination by a commission or board which has not had the evidence directly presented before it. The Briefs will be filed pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29.6., except that the Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file her brief, and the Respondent shall have 20 days from the date the Petitioner\u2019s brief is filed to file the Respondent\u2019s brief.\nBriefs from interested amici curiae are invited.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Anthony Bartels, for petitioner.",
      "Paul Waddell, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Vickie SCARBROUGH v. CHEROKEE ENTERPRISES and Royal Insurance Company\n91-54\n807 S.W.2d 468\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 22, 1991\nAnthony Bartels, for petitioner.\nPaul Waddell, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0295-01",
  "first_page_order": 321,
  "last_page_order": 322
}