{
  "id": 1902401,
  "name": "Bobby BRATTON v. Jim Guy TUCKER, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bratton v. Tucker",
  "decision_date": "1991-10-21",
  "docket_number": "91-161",
  "first_page": "39",
  "last_page": "40",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "307 Ark. 39"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "816 S.W.2d 888"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "788 S.W.2d 955",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1884311
      ],
      "year": 1990,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/302/0308-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1844,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.869,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06947702356392206
    },
    "sha256": "b7f5c81d6e0a239a25a8390c67fde50a23b7aa9f6e35af23fefd9dbd1ee97c5e",
    "simhash": "1:5993a7b2225f2278",
    "word_count": 311
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:45:32.876763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Brown, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Bobby BRATTON v. Jim Guy TUCKER, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case was initially filed in the Arkansas Court of Appeals and involves a second appeal. On June 3,1991, the appellant filed a motion in the court of appeals asking that this case be certified to the Arkansas Supreme Court. See Bobby Bratton v. Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Jackson and Tucker, 302 Arkansas 308, 788 S.W.2d 955 (1990). Motions to dismiss were also filed in the court of appeals by various appellees.\nOn June 19, 1991, the appellant\u2019s \u201cmotion to certify the Supreme Court, to remand and to stay brief time,\u201d as well as all other motions filed by the parties in the court of appeals, were certified to this court. The various appellees again filed motions to dismiss. The motions of all parties were submitted to this court on June 24, 1991; on July 1, 1991, the appellees\u2019 motions to dismiss the appeal were granted, and the appellant\u2019s motion to remand and to stay briefing time was declared moot.\nSubsequent to this July 1, 1991, order of dismissal, the appellant has filed petitions for \u201creconsideration\u201d and a \u201cmotion to recall order.\u201d On July 15, 1991, the appellant\u2019s requests were denied. The appellant continues to file pleadings in this court such as this petition for writ of error coram nobis, which are without merit and which are burdensome to the administrative affairs of the court. The clerk is therefore directed to dismiss this petition for writ of error coram nobis and to accept no further filings by Bobby Bratton with reference to proceedings involving Case No. 91-161, regarding Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Jackson and Tucker, Jim Guy Tucker, et al.\nIT IS SO ORDERED.\nBrown, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Art Dodrill, for appellant.",
      "Ken Cook and James L. Glover, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bobby BRATTON v. Jim Guy TUCKER, et al.\n91-161\n816 S.W.2d 888\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 21, 1991\nArt Dodrill, for appellant.\nKen Cook and James L. Glover, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0039-01",
  "first_page_order": 65,
  "last_page_order": 66
}