{
  "id": 1902393,
  "name": "Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge",
  "name_abbreviation": "Henderson v. Davis",
  "decision_date": "1991-11-04",
  "docket_number": "91-93",
  "first_page": "170",
  "last_page": "171",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "307 Ark. 170"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "816 S.W.2d 612"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "706 S.W.2d 178",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        8721474
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0417-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "218 Ark. 417",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 902,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.915,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06947663744102456
    },
    "sha256": "26ca7a68ebaaad1a35148b77db238d8486ea27c2acb5aee5d862e2a312e7eb06",
    "simhash": "1:70df1815400f62a7",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:45:32.876763+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe petitioner, Harold Henderson, asks the court to reconsider his motion to have the Attorney General print his pro se brief. This court has twice denied the same motion on June 17, 1991, and again on October 14, 1991.\nThis is a civil case and Henderson has not made the requisite showing that his suit has merit. See Glick v. Lockhart, 218 Ark. 417, 706 S.W.2d 178 (1986).\nThe appellant continues to file pleadings in this court concerning the printing of his pro se brief, which are without merit and which are burdensome to the administrative affairs of the court. The clerk is therefore directed to dismiss this motion for reconsideration and to accept no further filings by Harold Henderson in this regard.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge\n91-93\n816 S.W.2d 612\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 4, 1991\nAppellant, pro se.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0170-01",
  "first_page_order": 196,
  "last_page_order": 197
}