{
  "id": 1904381,
  "name": "Thomas GRISWOLD v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction",
  "name_abbreviation": "Griswold v. Lockhart",
  "decision_date": "1992-02-03",
  "docket_number": "91-342",
  "first_page": "265",
  "last_page": "266",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "308 Ark. 265"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "822 S.W.2d 388"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "289 Ark. 564",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1875414
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/289/0564-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 839,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.926,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3923317537045596
    },
    "sha256": "b786823acd39170b78b4ecf9b036ece2f55c5bf74b4cd0e8c08a88503df08cda",
    "simhash": "1:ca94047c5b4de572",
    "word_count": 134
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:40.186541+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas GRISWOLD v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant seeks permission to file a handwritten brief which we will entertain upon a substantial showing of merit. Patterson v. State, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for habeas corpus based on allegations that appellant was charged by information rather than indictment and that he was never afforded a \u201cfirst appearance\u201d before being bound over to circuit court. However, these are not matters cognizable by habeas corpus and, accordingly, appellant has failed to make a substantial showing of merit. Motion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas GRISWOLD v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction\n91-342\n822 S.W.2d 388\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 3, 1992\nAppellant, pro se.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0265-01",
  "first_page_order": 291,
  "last_page_order": 292
}