{
  "id": 1906011,
  "name": "Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Austin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1992-04-06",
  "docket_number": "CR 92-349",
  "first_page": "145",
  "last_page": "145",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "309 Ark. 145"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "825 S.W.2d 608"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 694,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.904,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.688403287882615e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06804628725980456
    },
    "sha256": "5ef22fd5cf62d64ca8a9067dbfb3b9d607b79533adaaf026222826a086a623d2",
    "simhash": "1:734e3c75201b74a0",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:13:54.665869+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Curtis Nathaniel Austin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.\nHis attorney, Bill E. Ross, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to.the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bill E. Ross, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 92-349\n825 S.W.2d 608\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 6, 1992\nBill E. Ross, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0145-01",
  "first_page_order": 169,
  "last_page_order": 169
}