{
  "id": 1898895,
  "name": "Harold Edward CHISM v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chism v. State",
  "decision_date": "1992-09-28",
  "docket_number": "CR 92-569",
  "first_page": "504",
  "last_page": "504",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "310 Ark. 504"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "837 S.W.2d 479"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 690,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.927,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.688403287882615e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06785264653522581
    },
    "sha256": "b615c11da0681099eedb204ccfce6a87d79cd850657810cd22883bc120ad557d",
    "simhash": "1:334e04852839e86e",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:02:16.191716+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harold Edward CHISM v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Harold Edward Chism, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.\nHis attorney, Denny Hyslip, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Denny Hyslip, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harold Edward CHISM v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 92-569\n837 S.W.2d 479\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 28, 1992\nDenny Hyslip, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0504-01",
  "first_page_order": 544,
  "last_page_order": 544
}