{
  "id": 1935042,
  "name": "Carthel FULLER, Sr. v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fuller v. State",
  "decision_date": "1993-03-15",
  "docket_number": "CR 93-166",
  "first_page": "316",
  "last_page": "317",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "312 Ark. 316"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "852 S.W.2d 107"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 705,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.909,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.07025467507951236
    },
    "sha256": "97ca72e0db228f5f3126fd041987b41ce7422e0512c64a287b290b96d68ec0b3",
    "simhash": "1:334e0075fd2e8b28",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:48:25.249850+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carthel FULLER, Sr. v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Carthel Fuller, Sr., by his attorney, Hubert W. Alexander has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hubert W. Alexander, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Carthel FULLER, Sr. v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 93-166\n852 S.W.2d 107\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 15, 1993\nHubert W. Alexander, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0316-01",
  "first_page_order": 342,
  "last_page_order": 343
}