{
  "id": 1914621,
  "name": "Maurice COLEMAN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Coleman v. State",
  "decision_date": "1993-07-05",
  "docket_number": "CR 93-676",
  "first_page": "716",
  "last_page": "717",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "313 Ark. 716"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "856 S.W.2d 306"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "212 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 678,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.899,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.298132930532853e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3324269098314226
    },
    "sha256": "bcdefb59178198a86514abf1fa572270e3a43d83627893e87f22c5bfa513427f",
    "simhash": "1:33467b55452f5e2c",
    "word_count": 118
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:14:05.799320+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Maurice COLEMAN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Maurice Coleman, by his attorney, Bill E. Ross, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 212 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Billy E. Ross, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Maurice COLEMAN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 93-676\n856 S.W.2d 306\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered July 5, 1993\nBilly E. Ross, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0716-01",
  "first_page_order": 752,
  "last_page_order": 753
}