{
  "id": 1912753,
  "name": "Samuel LANGFORD v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Langford v. State",
  "decision_date": "1993-09-13",
  "docket_number": "CR 92-795",
  "first_page": "151",
  "last_page": "152",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "314 Ark. 151"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "860 S.W.2d 271"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 85,
    "char_count": 766,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.917,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.06972279078818881
    },
    "sha256": "40a872f7aac6b162eda1fcb295b8800201e6435b82f996c52f687b3e3b9ceaeb",
    "simhash": "1:3b425275ed3fdae8",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:56.854306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel LANGFORD v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPetitioner, Samuel Langford, by his attorney, Vandell Bland, Sr., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nA copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Vandell Bland, Sr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel LANGFORD v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 92-795\n860 S.W.2d 271\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 13, 1993\nVandell Bland, Sr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0151-01",
  "first_page_order": 177,
  "last_page_order": 178
}