{
  "id": 1912816,
  "name": "Sherman D. NOBLE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Noble v. State",
  "decision_date": "1993-09-27",
  "docket_number": "CR 93-427",
  "first_page": "240",
  "last_page": "241",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "314 Ark. 240"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "862 S.W.2d 234"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1384,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.919,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.7726358759725873e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8961951063556215
    },
    "sha256": "554720bc8e554a4bc2c3a41a3f176424520bb81be8fd496cdea14318afb61347",
    "simhash": "1:29dc44345a6dc034",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:56.854306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sherman D. NOBLE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "David Newbern, Justice.\nSherman Noble pleaded guilty to capital felony murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. On appeal, Noble contends the Trial Court should have granted his motion to suppress his in-custody statement made to the police. He argues the statement was involuntary.\nThe basis of this appeal of a guilty plea conviction is Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), which states:\n(b) With the approval of the court and the consent of the prosecuting attorney, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendr\u00e9 [contendere], reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to review of an adverse determination of a pretrial motion to suppress evidence. If the defendant prevails on appeal, he shall be allowed to withdraw his plea.\nNothing before us shows that Mr. Noble conditioned his guilty plea by reserving, in writing, his right to appeal. Nor is there any indication that the Trial Court or the prosecutor consented.\nAbsent any showing that these requirements were met, we dismiss the appeal.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "David Newbern, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mark F. Hampton, for appellant.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Clint Miller, Senior Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sherman D. NOBLE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 93-427\n862 S.W.2d 234\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 27, 1993\n[Rehearing denied November 1, 1993.]\nMark F. Hampton, for appellant.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Clint Miller, Senior Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee.\nBrown, J., would grant rehearing."
  },
  "file_name": "0240-01",
  "first_page_order": 266,
  "last_page_order": 267
}