{
  "id": 1455824,
  "name": "Terrick Terrell NOONER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nooner v. State",
  "decision_date": "1994-10-24",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-358",
  "first_page": "385",
  "last_page": "386",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "318 Ark. 385"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "885 S.W.2d 24"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1566,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.907,
    "sha256": "3e151fce87e21622227c011e719c88bb824bcf6672d2c7ebed823128b990d3ff",
    "simhash": "1:0e3daab080e9dca2",
    "word_count": 264
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:16.788487+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Terrick Terrell NOONER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Terrick Terrell Nooner was found guilty by a jury of capital murder and sentenced to death. On March 29, 1994, the record was lodged in this court on appeal. Appellant is represented by attorney Herbert Wright who has been granted several extensions of time to file the appellant\u2019s brief. When the most recent motion was granted, it was noted that the brief was due October 5, 1994, and that no further extensions of time would be granted. On October 4, 1994, Wright filed a \u201cmotion for continuance\u201d which is pending. On September 8, 1994, appellant filed two pro se motions, one seeking a copy of the transcript from Wright and the other seeking to have Wright removed as counsel and attorney Willard Proctor substituted.\nThe pro se motions are denied. Appellant has stated no reason or authority to demonstrate that he is entitled to a copy of the trial transcript. Clearly, the attorney for an appellant has no obligation to provide a copy of the trial transcript to the appellant.\nWith respect to the motion to substitute counsel, appellant states that Mr. Proctor has agreed to be substituted as counsel, but we have no request from Mr. Proctor to do so. Until such time as another attorney files a motion asking to be substituted as attomey-of-record or this court relieves Mr. Wright, this court will not consider appointing other counsel.\nMotions denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Herbert T. Wright, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Terrick Terrell NOONER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-358\n885 S.W.2d 24\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 24, 1994\nHerbert T. Wright, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0385-01",
  "first_page_order": 411,
  "last_page_order": 412
}