{
  "id": 1455675,
  "name": "Larry FRANKLIN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Franklin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1994-11-14",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-1002",
  "first_page": "687",
  "last_page": "688",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "318 Ark. 687"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "886 S.W.2d 633"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "702 S.W.2d 904",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "288 Ark. 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8718311
      ],
      "year": 1986,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/288/0172-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 79,
    "char_count": 630,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.895,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7497311619326069
    },
    "sha256": "baccb7753de1b4e908fe25133c8abdd092df8817eca88d86037620d187cbfec1",
    "simhash": "1:3b4250f73da7dc2a",
    "word_count": 111
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:16.788487+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Larry FRANKLIN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant, Larry Franklin, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Louis Etoch, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).\nThe motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Louis A. Etoch, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Larry FRANKLIN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-1002\n886 S.W.2d 633\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 14, 1994\nLouis A. Etoch, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0687-01",
  "first_page_order": 713,
  "last_page_order": 714
}