{
  "id": 1455829,
  "name": "Tyree JONES v. Ms. McCOOL, Records Supervisor, and Charlotte Sumner, Records Supervisor Arkansas Department of Correction",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jones v. McCool",
  "decision_date": "1994-11-14",
  "docket_number": "94-353",
  "first_page": "688",
  "last_page": "689",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "318 Ark. 688"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "886 S.W.2d 633"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "303 Ark. 438",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1882829
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1990,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/303/0438-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "306 Ark. 443",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1900959
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1991,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/306/0443-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1616,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.888,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.297179512999945e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6213385413589749
    },
    "sha256": "8f80772732344c843c60ee820e8498088eb3cb5cf121b4b4e5b6d945be2df280",
    "simhash": "1:636b44861630df88",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:16.788487+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Tyree JONES v. Ms. McCOOL, Records Supervisor, and Charlotte Sumner, Records Supervisor Arkansas Department of Correction"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant Tyree Jones, who is in the custody of the Arkansas Department of Correction by virtue of multiple felony convictions, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment against two persons employed in the Records Office of the Department. The circuit court denied the petition, and appellant brings this appeal.\nThe appellant has failed to include an abstract of any part of the record in the appellant\u2019s brief. Our Rule 4-2 (b)(2) provides that a judgment may be affirmed for noncompliance with Rule 4-2 (a)(6) which requires the appellant to abstract that part of the record which is material to the points argued in the appellant\u2019s brief. The failure to abstract a critical document precludes this court from considering issues concerning it. Porchia v. State, 306 Ark. 443, 815 S.W.2d 926 (1991). The abstracting requirement applies to those appellants who proceed pro se. Markham v. State, 303 Ark. 438, 798 S.W.2d 58 (1990). Nearly a month after the appellee state filed its brief, appellant filed a motion seeking to amend the brief to include an abstract. The motion is denied. Once the appellee has filed its brief, it is too late to file a motion to amend the appellant\u2019s brief. As the abstract in this case is totally deficient, we affirm.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant, pro se.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Clint Miller, Senior Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Tyree JONES v. Ms. McCOOL, Records Supervisor, and Charlotte Sumner, Records Supervisor Arkansas Department of Correction\n94-353\n886 S.W.2d 633\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 14, 1994\nAppellant, pro se.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Clint Miller, Senior Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0688-01",
  "first_page_order": 714,
  "last_page_order": 715
}