{
  "id": 1455857,
  "name": "Ronald Wade GAMMEL v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gammel v. State",
  "decision_date": "1994-12-05",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-1214",
  "first_page": "880",
  "last_page": "881",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "318 Ark. 880"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "890 S.W.2d 240"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1295,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.91,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.8172472706271035e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3029690147958433
    },
    "sha256": "7f30535e170e68c8a51ac8f39ce809df4aec889388901c6d6a77b2f206b3f91a",
    "simhash": "1:6bd6c207012cbdef",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:16.788487+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ronald Wade GAMMEL v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nRonald Wade Gammel was accused of drug offenses. His motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial was denied, and he filed a notice of appeal and attempted to lodge the record with this Court. The record eventually was filed after some difficulty concerning proper form.\nMr. Gammel now seeks a writ of certiorari to require the court reporter to put the record in proper form and assure that all necessary portions of the trial proceedings to date have been included. In his petition, he characterizes the proceeding here as \u201can interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 28.1(d), Ark. R. Crim. P. (petition for writ of prohibition).\u201d\nThere is no authority for an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for speedy trial. Assuming the writ of prohibition is the remedy sought, we have yet to receive a petition for such a writ, thus the filing of the record is premature.\nIn view of the circumstances, including Mr. Gammel\u2019s counsel\u2019s doubt as to the completeness and proper form of the record he has submitted, we deny the writ of certiorari and instruct the Clerk to return the record to Mr. Gammel.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C.S. \u201cChuck\u201d Gibson II, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ronald Wade GAMMEL v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-1214\n890 S.W.2d 240\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 5, 1994\nC.S. \u201cChuck\u201d Gibson II, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0880-01",
  "first_page_order": 908,
  "last_page_order": 909
}