{
  "id": 1455809,
  "name": "Michael James TANNER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tanner v. State",
  "decision_date": "1994-12-05",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-1261",
  "first_page": "888",
  "last_page": "888",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "318 Ark. 888"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "887 S.W.2d 311"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1443,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.87,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47243758226830984
    },
    "sha256": "8547ba4004d7b450695819004f1b095d2429989a448aec0ff986b93789cfebda",
    "simhash": "1:361261376e0bb9ea",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:16.788487+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michael James TANNER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn August 12, 1994, appellant was convicted of two felony counts and sentenced to twenty-four years. On August 22, 1994, appellant filed a motion for new trial. A hearing was held on appellant\u2019s motion on August 29, 1994, at which time the trial court orally denied the motion. No written order denying the motion was entered. Nonetheless, appellant filed his notice of appeal on the same date as the hearing. Appellant has now tendered his transcript with the supreme court clerk, but the clerk rejected it because appellant\u2019s notice of appeal was invalid since the court\u2019s written order denying a new trial had never been filed or entered. The clerk acted in accordance with our rules and case law. See Nance v. State, opinion delivered on November 21, 1994.\nAppellant\u2019s trial attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the notice of appeal and transcript, and upon filing same, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nSince trial and the filing of appellant\u2019s motion for new trial, new counsel has been added for appeal purposes.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hatfield & Lassiter, by: Jack T. Lassiter; and Kenneth E. Suggs, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michael James TANNER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-1261\n887 S.W.2d 311\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 5, 1994\nHatfield & Lassiter, by: Jack T. Lassiter; and Kenneth E. Suggs, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0888-01",
  "first_page_order": 916,
  "last_page_order": 916
}