{
  "id": 1453598,
  "name": "Christopher Ray STONE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stone v. State",
  "decision_date": "1994-12-20",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-61",
  "first_page": "180",
  "last_page": "181",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "319 Ark. 180"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "890 S.W.2d 257"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 2382,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.85,
    "sha256": "f6fcb0ee8880f636b1cf1b21f99be446c5682aa1884de914b66cd847e43856f9",
    "simhash": "1:4c6ed535616ece9a",
    "word_count": 402
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:29:57.133828+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Christopher Ray STONE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn June 20, 1993, a judgment of conviction was entered against appellant Christopher Ray Stone for first degree murder and a sentence of life imprisonment was imposed. A timely notice of appeal was filed by appellant\u2019s trial attorneys, Frank Shaw and F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell. The transcript was lodged with this court on February 21,1994, and at that time appellant\u2019s trial attorneys filed motions to be relieved as attorneys on appeal. Their motions to be relieved and to have substitute counsel appointed were denied. Counsel sought reconsideration of their motions to be relieved but reconsideration was denied.\nAppellant\u2019s attorneys next sought and obtained an extension of time in which to file the appellant\u2019s brief to July 1, 1994. When appellant\u2019s attorneys did not file the brief by that time, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to file a brief. A response to the motion to dismiss was filed on September 27, 1994, by F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell on appellant\u2019s behalf. Counsel also filed another motion for extension of time to file belated brief. By order entered October 10, 1994, this court denied the motion to dismiss appeal and granted the second motion for extension of time to file belated brief, extending the time to December 19, 1994. The order indicated that this was a final extension.\nRay Hartenstein has been contacted with regard to representing appellant on appeal, and he is familiar with appellant\u2019s case, as he assisted appellant\u2019s attorneys at trial. He has no objection to acting as appellant\u2019s counsel for this appeal so long as he is granted a 60-day extension in which to file appellant\u2019s brief.\nRay Hartenstein is added as counsel for appellant on this appeal and is granted a 60-day extension in which to file appellant\u2019s brief in this matter.\nBecause existing counsel, F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell and Frank Shaw, did not file a brief by December 19, 1994, which was the due date according to the final extension, we set a hearing date on Monday, January 2, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. and direct F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell and Frank Shaw to appear and show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failing to file the brief in this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank Shaw and F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Christopher Ray STONE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-61\n890 S.W.2d 257\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered December 20, 1994\nFrank Shaw and F.N. \u201cBuddy\u201d Troxell, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0180-01",
  "first_page_order": 214,
  "last_page_order": 215
}