{
  "id": 1453651,
  "name": "Ivan Floyd PIPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pipkin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1995-01-30",
  "docket_number": "CR 94-515",
  "first_page": "371",
  "last_page": "372",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "319 Ark. 371"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "892 S.W.2d 241"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 2387,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.861,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.903932100147132e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4607052380273908
    },
    "sha256": "94a4e37b118d890454225205842f960f56d3c182257796a5a71057aa66dfe558",
    "simhash": "1:9bda54b1745ff312",
    "word_count": 433
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:29:57.133828+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Glaze, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Ivan Floyd PIPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn May 17, 1994, Ivan Floyd Pipkin appealed his conviction in the Stone County Circuit Court, Case No. 91-36, and lodged the record of trial in this court. On June 24, Pip-kin\u2019s attorney, A. Wayne Davis, Little Rock, Arkansas, requested a seven-day clerk\u2019s extension, making his brief due on July 5, 1994.\nOn June 27, 1994, Mr. Davis, by letter, confirmed the clerk\u2019s extension and acknowledged that the appellant\u2019s brief would be due on Tuesday, July 5, 1994. On October 27, 1994, our clerk, Mr. Steen, mailed a letter to Mr. Davis advising him that the records indicated that a brief had not been filed or tendered in the appellant\u2019s behalf, nor had a further motion for an extension of time been granted. In addition, the clerk called for a response to his letter, to which Mr. Davis has not replied.\nOn November 21, 1994, we ordered Pipkin\u2019s counsel, A. Wayne Davis, to appear in this court on Monday, December 5, 1994, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the abstract and brief. Mr. Davis appeared in person and pled not guilty asserting that he had a meritorious defense. As a result, this court appointed a Master to conduct hearings, during which Mr. Davis admitted he was the attorney of record and was solely responsible for filing a brief on behalf of Mr. Pip-kin in this court. At the time of the Master\u2019s hearing, Mr. Davis announced that he had almost completed a brief on behalf of Mr. Pipkin, and that it would be tendered to the clerk on December 27, 1994.\nBy per curiam order dated January 9, 1995, we held Mr. Davis in contempt for failing to comply with this court\u2019s directives to file a brief on behalf of his client, and in addition, we fined him $500.00.\nThe court has been informed by the clerk that Mr. Davis has yet to tender an abstract and brief in his client\u2019s behalf and has failed to pay his fine to the court.\nFor these reasons, we set a hearing date on Monday, February 6, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. and direct Mr. Pipkin\u2019s counsel, A. Wayne Davis, to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the abstract and brief in this case as well as pay his fine for contempt of court.\nGlaze, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. Wayne Davis, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ivan Floyd PIPKIN v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 94-515\n892 S.W.2d 241\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 30, 1995\nA. Wayne Davis, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0371-01",
  "first_page_order": 405,
  "last_page_order": 406
}