#### Douglas James CLAYTON v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 94-1446

902 S.W.2d 772

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered July 17, 1995

Ralph M. Cloar, for appellant.

No response.

.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Douglas James Clayton petitions for rehearing on the basis that this court erred in dismissing his appeal on the basis that his notice of appeal was ineffective. See Clayton v. State, 321 Ark. 217, 900 S.W.2d 537 (1995). According to Clayton, we previously granted his motion for rule on the clerk, permitting him to lodge his transcript. See Clayton v. State, 319 Ark. 291, 890 S.W.2d 602 (1995) (Clayton I). We agree that we erred in dismissing the appeal, and we direct the Clerk of the Supreme Court to reinstate the appeal.