{
  "id": 1449522,
  "name": "Troy MAYO v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mayo v. State",
  "decision_date": "1995-09-18",
  "docket_number": "CR 95-802",
  "first_page": "566",
  "last_page": "567",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "321 Ark. 566"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "906 S.W.2d 285"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "264 Ark. 561",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1668966
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1978,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/264/0561-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 172,
    "char_count": 1990,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.868,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6005794160200073
    },
    "sha256": "c85da82d056f4554877dcc4f86d0a3f909c3a3903dc8d7723c0104b27f54768a",
    "simhash": "1:e225e666787ca0bd",
    "word_count": 342
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:21:00.559388+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Troy MAYO v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nTroy Mayo has filed this Motion for Rule on the Clerk through his attorney, Roy C. Lewellen. His attorney does not admit fault, but states that the court reporter was involved in an accident which caused a delay in preparation of the transcript.\nThe chronology of this appeal is as follows:\nJudgment and Commitment Order Entered 12/8/94\nNotice of Appeal and Designation of Record 1/6/95\nOrder for Extension of Time to prepare transcript to July 6, 1995 4/6/95\nTranscript completed and given to Circuit Clerk 7/7/95\nTranscript tendered 7/10/95\nMr. Mayo attached a letter from the circuit clerk which stated that the court reporter was unable to complete the transcript until July 7, 1995 because she was involved in a car accident. However, this letter is dated July 14, 1995, and is not stamped as received by the attorney until July 17, 1995. Thus, although the transcript may have been late because of the court reporter\u2019s misfortune, it appears that this letter was obtained after the tendered record was rejected by the Clerk\u2019s office.\nIt is an attorney\u2019s duty to file the record on time. In this case the record was late because an order of extension was not entered before the period for filing the record had expired. See Ark. R. App. P. 5. At a minimum, Mr. Mayo\u2019s attorney should have filed a partial record by the July 6 due date when it became apparent that the transcript would not be completed on time.\nThe appellant\u2019s attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, and upon filing same, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy C. Lewellen, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Troy MAYO v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 95-802\n906 S.W.2d 285\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 18, 1995\nRoy C. Lewellen, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0566-01",
  "first_page_order": 616,
  "last_page_order": 617
}