{
  "id": 1445760,
  "name": "Johnny BRADLEY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bradley v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-02-26",
  "docket_number": "CR 95-895",
  "first_page": "564",
  "last_page": "565",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "323 Ark. 564"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "916 S.W.2d 113"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1577,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.916,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.762899658878753
    },
    "sha256": "e19e0afe300b7af3f5883f3803c6d719dbdc09679a5e8cdca831c957760fadf1",
    "simhash": "1:86c2135f0e0294b8",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:17:29.924838+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Johnny BRADLEY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant seeks an extension of time in which to complete and file his record on appeal. Due to the special circumstances in the case, we grant the motion.\nOn October 23, 1995, we granted appellant\u2019s pro se motion for a belated appeal. Attorney Charles Honey was appointed to represent the appellant and was directed to file a petition for a writ of certiorari to complete the record. The petition was filed on December 11, 1995. We issued the writ to the Ouachita County clerk and court reporter on January 16, 1996, returnable on February 15, 1996. The writ has not been returned.\nOn January 29, 1996, the appellant filed the instant motion for an extension of time in which to complete and file the record. His motion states that the court reporter who originally recorded the trial proceedings has retired, causing the new reporter to be overloaded.\nOrdinarily, we do not allow an extension of time once the clerk and court reporter have been directed to return a writ on a certain date. However, the circumstances in this case are exceptional. One court reporter has retired, leaving a new reporter with an increased burden. Additionally, the appellant\u2019s attorney was appointed only recently and no delays in the case can be attributed to him.\nA new writ of certiorari is hereby issued to the clerk and court reporter of Ouachita County, returnable on March 26, 1996.\nMotion granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Honey & Honey, P.A., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Johnny BRADLEY v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 95-895\n916 S.W.2d 113\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered February 26, 1996\nHoney & Honey, P.A., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0564-01",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 599
}