{
  "id": 1445706,
  "name": "Barry Lynn SIMPSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Simpson v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-03-04",
  "docket_number": "CR 95-967",
  "first_page": "582",
  "last_page": "583",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "323 Ark. 582"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "916 S.W.2d 119"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "320 Ark. 75",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1451135
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/320/0075-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "323 Ark. 16",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1445748
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1996,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/323/0016-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1334,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.901,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05436262886369051
    },
    "sha256": "d821a13da0f5b4cdf01a5de37270769ac843f090c196c22bc86a2ffa58f1cac2",
    "simhash": "1:30b288a6f101c590",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:17:29.924838+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Barry Lynn SIMPSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "David Newbern, Justice.\nBarry Lynn Simpson pleaded guilty to the charge of first-degree murder in connection with the death of his father. In the sentencing phase of his trial, the State presented the testimony of members of the family concerning the effect the crime had upon them and their children. Mr. Simpson argues it was reversible error to have received the testimony because he was not notified that the witnesses would testify. We affirm the conviction because the issue presented on appeal was not presented to the Trial Court.\nAt the sentencing hearing, Mr. Simpson\u2019s only argument was that the witnesses should not have been allowed to testify because their testimony was cumulative to evidence contained in the presentencing report. The point about lack of notice was not presented and is entirely different from the argument made to the Trial Court. If the ground of an objection is changed on appeal, the argument is considered to have been waived. Whitney v. Holland Retirement Ctr., 323 Ark. 16, 912 S.W.2d 427 (1996); Stewart v. State, 320 Ark. 75, 894 S.W.2d 930 (1995).\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "David Newbern, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joe Kelly Hardin, for appellant.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Barry Lynn SIMPSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 95-967\n916 S.W.2d 119\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 4, 1996\nJoe Kelly Hardin, for appellant.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0582-01",
  "first_page_order": 616,
  "last_page_order": 617
}