{
  "id": 369136,
  "name": "Cedric Gerald MOORE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moore v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-09-16",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-95",
  "first_page": "468",
  "last_page": "469",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "325 Ark. 468"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "929 S.W.2d 149"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "321 Ark. 610",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1449551
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1995,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/321/0610-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1187,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.811,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.719567370958748e-08,
      "percentile": 0.29544251421607975
    },
    "sha256": "33f7e3ff57d4bcb815da56efefb65ea158f173c48faf7150e6f9a8203b41d988",
    "simhash": "1:2dce20cce7151e01",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:33:21.718216+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Cedric Gerald MOORE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ROBERT H. Dudley, Justice.\nCedric Gerald Moore was convicted of kidnapping, attempted rape, and theft of property. We summarily affirm the judgment of conviction because the abstract is flagrantly deficient. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2 (b)(2).\nThe abstract contains only the information, immaterial motions and orders involving the appointment and substitution of counsel, and an order reflecting an earlier mistrial. It contains no references to the testimony, arguments, riflings, instructions, jury\u2019s findings, or the judgment of conviction. When an appellant\u2019s abstract is flagrantly deficient we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction pursuant to Rule 4-2. Edwards v. State, 321 Ark. 610, 906 S.W.2d 310 (1995). Enigmatically, the transcript does not contain any of the testimony, argument, instructions, or rulings, and the points for reversal, which involve alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, do not assert trial court error. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ROBERT H. Dudley, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mark Ferguson, for appellant.",
      "Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Gil Dudley, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Cedric Gerald MOORE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-95\n929 S.W.2d 149\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 16, 1996\nMark Ferguson, for appellant.\nWinston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Gil Dudley, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0468-01",
  "first_page_order": 496,
  "last_page_order": 497
}