{
  "id": 12021736,
  "name": "Allen SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. State",
  "decision_date": "1996-10-07",
  "docket_number": "CR 96-662",
  "first_page": "238",
  "last_page": "238",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 Ark. 238"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "928 S.W.2d 799"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1130,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.806,
    "sha256": "d8f3937dd00e43857c0e988f51831997b7022a80af5157bf6ccb44a2538998bc",
    "simhash": "1:08aa8438b067ac83",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:03.555215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Allen SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant, Allen Smith, was convicted by a jury of two counts of aggravated assault for which he was sentenced to a total of twelve years in prison. On July 2, 1996, Smith\u2019s attorney, Louis Anthony Etoch, was granted an extension until August 29, 1996, to file his brief on appeal. Again, on August 21, 1996, Etoch was granted a second and final extension to file a brief with such being due on September 19, 1996. However, on September 19, 1996, Etoch filed a \u201cMotion for Belated Appeal,\u201d asserting that he intended to file the brief \u201cnext week\u201d and asking that he be allowed to file the brief \u201cas soon as possible.\u201d Etoch has thus far failed to file or tender a brief on behalf of his client.\nThe Motion for Belated Appeal is denied. Louis Anthony Etoch is hereby ordered to appear before this court on the fourteenth day of October, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for his failure to file the appellant\u2019s brief.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Louis A. Etoch, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Allen SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 96-662\n928 S.W.2d 799\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 7, 1996\nLouis A. Etoch, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0238-01",
  "first_page_order": 272,
  "last_page_order": 272
}