{
  "id": 12023101,
  "name": "Monty SCOTT, et al. v. Sharon PRIEST, Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scott v. Priest",
  "decision_date": "1996-10-28",
  "docket_number": "96-1077",
  "first_page": "466",
  "last_page": "467",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "326 Ark. 466"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "932 S.W.2d 751"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1652,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.838,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.6922169990516086e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2940240917520674
    },
    "sha256": "1a61757eed0abc0b7582f9344de7080aca30e9c4436b4b56f281bbd1c82512fa",
    "simhash": "1:a9d6e8c4259e7ba4",
    "word_count": 270
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:03.555215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Special Justice JOHN C. LESSEL joins in this opinion.",
      "Dudley, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Monty SCOTT, et al. v. Sharon PRIEST, Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe Petitioners, Monty Scott, Bob Wheeler, Bill Goodwin, Eric Jackson, and Bill Walmsley, individually and on behalf of the Committee Against Amendment 8, brought this original action. They challenge the certification made by the Secretary of State with respect to the sufficiency of the number of signatures of registered voters needed to place proposed Amendment 8 to the Arkansas Constitution on the ballot in the coming general election. See Ark. Const, amend. 7.\nWe appointed the Honorable Jack Lessenberry as master to ascertain the facts in the dispute. Judge Lessenberry filed his report in a timely manner.\nWe need consider the petition no further, as proposed amendment 8 was, on October 21, 1996, held by this Court to be improper, on other grounds, for inclusion on the ballot. Our opinion to that effect was rendered in response to an original action brought by these same Petitioners against the Secretary of State in case number 96-1078.\nDiane Bray intervened in this action and moved to disqualify the Friday Law Firm from its representation of the Petitioners on the ground of conflict of interests. That issue has become moot as a result of our action in case number 96-1078.\nOriginal action dismissed.\nSpecial Justice JOHN C. LESSEL joins in this opinion.\nDudley, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Friday, Eldredge & Clark, by: Elizabeth Robben Murray, for petitioners.",
      "Ann Purvis and Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: M. Wade Hodge, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Monty SCOTT, et al. v. Sharon PRIEST, Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas\n96-1077\n932 S.W.2d 751\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered October 28, 1996\nFriday, Eldredge & Clark, by: Elizabeth Robben Murray, for petitioners.\nAnn Purvis and Winston Bryant, Att\u2019y Gen., by: M. Wade Hodge, Asst. Att\u2019y Gen., for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0466-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 501
}